DEAN v. CALDWELL., 229 Ga. 1, 189 S.E.2.d 79 (1972)
Linked as:
Text
1. Where, as in this case, the evidence adduced at the habeas corpus hearing authorized a finding that the prisoner was fully advised as to his rights, was represented by competent counsel, and voluntarily and intelligently entered a plea of guilty, the judgment remanding the prisoner to custody was not error. Compare Mack v. Youmans, 228 Ga. 223 (184 SE2d 648); Laidler v. Smith, 227 Ga. 759 (182 SE2d 891); Purvis v. Connell, 227 Ga. 764 (182 SE2d 892).
2. The fact that a specially employed prosecuting attorney had previously represented the defendant in an unrelated matter is not a ground for a writ of habeas corpus.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
1972
Sponsored links
This document cites
- Supreme Court of Georgia - MACK v. YOUMANS., 228 Ga. 223, 184 S.E.2.d 648 (1971)
- Supreme Court of Georgia - LAIDLER v. SMITH., 227 Ga. 759, 182 S.E.2.d 891 (1971)
- Supreme Court of Georgia - PURVIS v. CONNELL., 227 Ga. 764, 182 S.E.2.d 892 (1971)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
