Text
Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Paul Webb, Solicitor-General, Frank S. French, Lay Milam, Charlie O. Murphy, and J. R. Parham, Assistant Attorney-General, contra.Swift Tyler, Wilbur B. Nall, and Marvin O'Neal Jr., for plaintiff in error.
Where, upon the trial of one charged with murder, witnesses for the State testify that the accused had told them that he shot the deceased, but that the deceased was advancing upon him with a knife, had him hemmed in, and took hold of his jacket, the issue of voluntary manslaughter was thereby made, and the court erred in failing to charge the substance of Code 26-1007 even though there was no request therefor.
The special ground of the motion for new trial complains solely because of the failure to charge voluntary manslaughter as defined in Code 26-1007. The State's attorneys contend that, if voluntary manslaughter is involved, it was injected into the case solely by the statement of the accused upon the trial and, as repeatedly held by this court, the judge was not required to charge thereon in the absence of a timely request so to do.
Counsel for the State largely rely upon the decision in Irwin v. State,
Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.
1951
Sponsored links