WALTERS v. CITY OF DUBLIN et al., 262 Ga. 265, 417 S.E.2.d 144 (1992)
Linked as:
Summary
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
Summary
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
Text
Joe H. Thalgott, for appellant.
Johnson defeated the incumbent, Walters, in an election for city council on October 1, 1991. After the election, Walters filed a petition challenging the election on the ground that Johnson was disqualified and ineligible to hold office because he violated the following provision of the city charter:
No appointed officer or employee of the City shall in any manner contribute to, participate in, or take part in any election, primary or any political contests, other than exercising his right to vote; provided, the foregoing prohibitions shall apply only to those elections, primaries or political contests for the City. Any person violating the provisions of this Section shall be punishable as for violation of a City Ordinance.
The city council validated the election and denied the contest. The trial court dismissed the appeal on the merits, holding that as a volunteer non-compensated member of two city boards (the board of education and the housing authority), Johnson was neither an "appointed officer" nor an "employee" of the city. Further, the trial court held that the intent of the provision is not to create a disqualification of city council candidates, but rather to control political activity of city employees and officers. Compare Columbus v. Bd. of Water Commrs.,
There was no error.
Harold D. McLendon, Larsen & West, William W. Larsen, Jr., Green & Tribble, Judson L. Green III, for appellees.
Sponsored links
